According to the Merriam-Webster
dictionary, the definition of "own" is "belonging to oneself or
itself —usually used following a possessive case or possessive adjective"
or "used to express immediate or direct kinship". But this definition seems too right, or
correct. Like many and most things in
life, things aren't always black and white.
There are always gray areas. In
this definition, you have a very concrete answer given to you. It is also objective, not a hint of emotion
or opinion. This makes it hard to find
some sort of view on what the word means.
But, like some philosophical words, we must find the definition
ourselves. Ownership means being
responsible for yourself and your actions.
Ownership goes much deeper than owning physical objects because owning
those physical objects is what defines who you are and your actions.
Owning your capabilities and actions
creates a relationship with your values.
Bill Gates, former CEO of Microsoft, was once known as one of "the
richest man alive". He was ranked
number two. However, instead of using
his money for selfish reasons, he created a foundation in 2000 and donated over
20 billion dollars to charity, regardless of all the power and money he
had. In this example, Gates was OWNING
his capabilities but evidently doing something for the community with his own money
rather than for himself; he was capable of doing something for somebody else and
owned that capability. This reflects on
his values and personality because by looking at this, you can tell that he is
passionate about not only financial success but also about common welfare of
citizens. Owning the satisfaction of
helping others was clearly more important to him than owning billions of
dollars.
Everyone has heard of the cliché
saying "money can't buy you happiness". But is it all that cliché? When you go to the mall and buy those new
Uggs or a new TV, does it really bring you true happiness? Once again, the answer lies in relationship
with capabilities and values. No doubt,
buying new materials creates a sense of excitement but the duration of that
excitement depends on the person.
Someone who has very materialistic values may find permanent joy in
having a collection of valuables at all times.
However, there may be someone else who only finds temporary joy in
buying a new shirt or a watch.
What does this mean, though? What idea this conclude? Well, this proves my first point that not
everything is black and white. Through
this analysis it has been hard to make a certain judgment on ownership because
of the variety of personalities. And to
say that one person is wrong over the other would be incredibly invalid. So, to conclude this thought process,
ownership tends to grow deeper than objects to the extent of how one person treasures them. Ownership is more about how someone displays
their values, capabilities, and actions when in the possession of these
physical objects.
Hey, Purvi. Nice job.
ReplyDeleteIn the last paragraph, you take a more exploratory approach. I feel that in order to make your argument stronger, you should be more solid in your view. "Through this analysis it has been hard to make a certain judgment on ownership because of the variety of personalities" come across that you are a little unsure of yourself, and your ideas are good, so be confident with them.
There is kind of a split in tone between the Bill Gates and the buying things paragraphs. This could easily be fixed with more of a transition into the second or a kind of connecting sentence in the two. Other than that, this is great.
Hey Purvi, Ok I know I wasn't sitting next to you in class, in fact i think you were across the room from me, but I forget the other person who was sitting next to me and I usually enjoy reading your work so I'm going to comment on This blog now. Alright where do I begin, first I love it as always. I love the flow and rhythm that is brought into this blog that makes it very comfortable to read. For instance it is not crowded with a multitude of facts. You included one outside example which was good. I also liked the approach you took. I never thought of ownership in a way of being responsible for one's actions and you made that clear for me. The only criticism that I have is for your third paragraph. I think it would be nice to elaborate on it a bit more. I felt as if it ended a bit abruptly. Other than yet, you did a fantastic job. Keep up the good work.
ReplyDeleteHi, Purvi:
ReplyDeleteI love that your writing style is very consistent here; the sound of your sentences is solid and pretty confident. The general structure here is fine--you have a thesis, explore the topic, use examples, yadda yadda. What I think perhaps you were picking up on, when you expressed uncertainty, is that your argument just splashes on the surface of this topic. The best responses really dive deep into the issue and explore the nuances of ownership. You set yourself up for success. Your thesis:
"Ownership goes much deeper than owning physical objects because owning those physical objects is what defines who you are and your actions" has a lot of promise--the idea of being defined by physical objects is really intriguing. But you evade it. What does it mean to be defined by an object? You start to dabble in that idea with Bill Gates, but need to explore that idea with more nuance. Like Briana, I'm not sure how your third paragraph connects back to the thesis....
So keep pushing that thinking. Keep asking yourself, "So what?" and see where that takes you. (Then ask "so what?" again...and again.)