The argument begins with introducing the main idea/problem,
that freshmen are not prepared for the new high school environment and social
stress. It continues by stating personal
experience with social and academic anxiety and stress, building the author's
credibility and ethos.
"I entered high school with PTSD, Anxiety Disorder,
and Clinical Depression."
This indicates the author's personal relation with high
school and mental illnesses and the authority they have on presenting this
issue.
Later, the author builds their ethos even more by relating
with other freshmen and high school students.
"As a current high school student with similar
issues, I know what it feels like to take one step forward and ten steps back."
By showing that the author is currently in high school, they
are implying that they know what high school life is like and how freshmen can
adapt to the environment. In the same
paragraph, the author uses parallel
structure to further emphasize their point and build their ethos.
"I know what it feels like to take one step
forward and ten steps back. I know
what it feels like to not be able to speak up in class. I know what it feels like to be
misunderstood and rejected."
Warrants in the article are not clearly stated but somewhat
implied throughout the passage.
·
Stress and anxiety can
cause mental instability.
·
Bullying and suicide can be
caused by stress and anxiety.
·
Confidence is lowered when
put under pressure and stress.
The ultimate claim does not come until the middle of the
paragraph about the author's motives.
"If they take this class in their first year, they
will be prepared for coming years in their high school career."
The reasoning comes in the second to last paragraph.
"We will have a more inviting school community. Students will be able to get along with each
other because they know that they are all in the same boat. Bullying and suicide will be cut down because
students will stick together, knowing that they are all going through the same
process of anxiety and stress. Students
will be more confident about themselves and be able to present themselves with
pride."
The claim and reasoning effectively go hand in hand and the
warrants also show the thought process between the reasoning and the claim and
displays valid assumptions on the issue.
However, qualifiers and rebuttals are not identified in the
article. To build the character of the
author, presenting counter claims and not generalizing the population of
students may have been helpful. In
addition, specific data and statistics may also increase the validity of the
passage and be accepted more by the audience, which seem to be the students as well as the school administration.
No comments:
Post a Comment